Indiana House Passes a Bill on Union Fees
Published: January 25, 2012 - New York Times
The Republican-held Indiana House of Representatives
passed legislation on Wednesday barring union contracts from requiring nonunion
members to pay fees for representation, ending weeks of partisan battling and
all but assuring that the state will become the first in the Midwestern
manufacturing belt deemed a gright to workh state.
Even as the lawmakers in Indianapolis voted 54 to 44,
mostly along partisan lines, to approve the measure, legislators and union
leaders in other states said they were preparing for similar fights ahead. In
some states, Republican supporters of gright to workh provisions said Indianafs
move — the first state to take such a course in more than a decade — had added a
sense of urgency to their own efforts.
gIfm disappointed that they beat us to this one,h Mike
Shirkey, a Republican state representative from Michigan, said of Indiana,
adding that he hoped a similar measure might soon be debated in Michigan. gNow a
border state is going to establish a leverage position in being attractive to
businesses.h
Union organizers, who had mobilized scores of
supporters to chant in protest from the halls in the Indiana Statehouse, said
Indianafs fight had left them girding for battles in other capitals.
gTheyfre not going to stop in Indiana,h Brian Buhle,
secretary-treasurer of the Teamsters Local 135 in Indianapolis, said after the
vote. gAnd therefs certainly going to be a national effort on behalf of all of
national labor to try to stop it from spreading to other states in the Midwest.h
The legislation in Indiana, which Republican leaders
said would help the statefs ability to attract businesses but Democrats argued
would weaken unions and lower workersf wages, still needs approval from the
Republican-dominated State Senate and the signature of Gov. Mitch Daniels, a
Republican. Both steps were expected in a matter of days, so leaders in Indiana
were already presuming that the state would soon become the 23rd in the nation
with a gright to workh law.
gI know wefre going to get looks from employers now
that werenft looking at Indiana,h Brian Bosma, the Republican speaker of
Indianafs House, said after the vote, which affects private-sector businesses.
Democrats, who hold 40 of the 100 seats in the House,
had for days stayed away from meetings to prevent a quorum and a vote on the
provision that protesters here called a gright to work for lessh law. But,
facing fines as steep as $1,000 per day, the Democrats finally appeared on the
House floor on Wednesday afternoon, at one point opening doors to the chamber so
that chants from the protesters flooded the room. One alluded to coming
elections: gRemember November!h
gThis is an embarrassment before the nation,h
Representative Scott Pelath, a Democrat, said of the final vote, in which all
Democrats who were present voted eno,f as did five Republicans.
Leaders in other states that have considered similar
legislation acknowledged that they were watching closely — both for the outcome
of the vote and scale of the protests. While Indiana was seen as a place where
the current political alignment made such a measure more likely to pass, more
debates were expected in the coming months.
In New Hampshire, where the Legislature passed a
similar law last year that was vetoed by the Democratic governor, new
legislation, aimed at public workers, was being considered. And in Maine, some
leaders are pushing for a similar
measure. In Missouri, a bill calling for a statewide vote on a gright to
workh provision has been advanced by a Senate committee.
gTheir having passed right to work is an encouragement
to legislators in the state of Missouri,h Senator Robert N. Mayer, a Republican
there, said of Indiana. gThis just shows that other states are looking.h